CLT Consultation on Mission in the Global Network
Following an online survey of 230+ people from across the global Edmund Rice network about mission, their roles and the future we are happy to share the initial report. This is an on-going process where consultation will continue to happen.
Mission Survey Report
2021
Executive Summary
There was significant engagement with the Survey with a high and equal number of responses from Brothers and ‘others’. The inspiration of the Edmund Rice vision was highlighted as a strong motivating force for involvement in mission among respondents. Most respondents feel connected with the Edmund Rice network but there is significant appetite for even greater connection.
Three quarters of respondents anticipate being in their current roles for the next 5 years. There were very strong responses to the Questions for Further Exploration expressing an appetite for further exploration of the themes raised in the survey, as well as identifying concreted areas for further exploration including: structures for better collaboration, alternative models of leadership, good practice in development and rights based approaches to mission.
General: Who were the respondents?
There were 237 responses to the survey. Almost 80 % were from male respondents. Half of the respondents were Christian Brothers. This gives some explanation of the gender imbalance.
There were responses from all age demographics. However, just over 50% of respondents were aged 55 years and older. The majority of the rest were over 35 years.
Roughly one quarter of responses were received from each of the 4 major regions: The Americas, Europe, Africa and the Asia Pacific.
Kenya, South Africa and Zambia were the largest responding groups from Africa, while India and Australia had over half of responses from the Asia Pacific.
All regions were equally represented in responses from the Americas, while the Republic of Ireland and England dominated responses from Europe.
Over 30% of respondents Identified as working in formal school education (predominantly secondary). No other category of work/ministry dominated the other 70% of responses.
The Question of Ministry
The vast majority of respondents (86%), considered the work that they do to be a ministry. Many provided insights into their motivation and how they approach their work, the values which inspire them, through references to the vision and example of Edmund Rice and the priorities of the Gospel. Only 1 person framed their work as ministry because of their commitment to Church, while 2 others spoke of being motivated by a sense of discipleship.
28 respondents replied referencing the Edmund Rice charism. They consider their work as ministry and are inspired by the charism or values or ethos of Edmund:
- Reaching out to those most in need was key to what Edmund Rice was about.
- Everything we do is focused on spreading the spirit of Edmund Rice.
- It is our endeavour to try and follow our Founder in whatever little way that we can.
- For some time now the Edmund Rice story has been my inspiration in educating the poor by providing quality education to marginalized communities.
- I am entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring that the vision, mission, and core values of Edmund Rice Education are put into action.
Issues raised included justice, faith-based education, inclusion and outreach to marginalised people:
- I lead an Edmund Rice school so the charism and ethos of the school is in my care.
- We are a Human Rights Organization inspired by the charism of Blessed Edmund Rice as we work to bring about positive social change and equal access… we want to keep the message about justice of Blessed Edmund Rice alive!
- Inspired by the vision and life of Blessed Edmund Rice, we believe that education in all its forms offers opportunities for the promotion of a rights-based and faith-based approach to social justice and ecological advocacy.
- I share in the charism of Edmund and feel driven from within to work with children and youth to help them realise their true reality as unique and gifted children of God and to help them work towards building the Kingdom of God’.
- I provide workshops for staff development on the Charism of Edmund Rice and Catholic Identity.
80 people referred to schools in their replies. A common theme was the provision of a holistic education:
- Promoting advocacy, leadership, commitment to social justice, human rights and faith development as part of a holistic, values driven education.
- Helping our young men to develop into caring, compassionate human beings.
- We promote a Catholic education in the tradition of Edmund Rice – an education of the whole person, formation for life.
- One of the ways of helping young people to grow is through the provision of experiences of outreach to poor or marginalised people.
- I work with college aged students providing opportunities for service and immersion experiences.
Several school or network leaders frame their work in the context of their own faith or in terms of keeping the spirit of Edmund alive and the role they have in mentoring and influencing others:
- We no longer have Christian Brothers at the school. I have to ensure that we continue with the Charism of Edmund Rice.
- It has become clear that our schools are places of guiding all members, staff, parents and the children along a path of discovering a relationship with others and with the Creator.
12 people described their role in the area of advocacy and human rights. They wrote about their work with youth in informal settings such as camps, vocational training or young people living on the streets. Most did not address the question of ‘ministry’, however the following comments were received:
- Ministry is not a word we usually use but we do work to instil the values of Edmund Rice in the young people we work with, so perhaps ministry is the correct word.’
- The question if it is a ministry – yes definitely. Though I have loved and enjoyed the regular classroom, I see a hunger out there for something ‘beyond the academics’… It is not what we do, but the way we do it and the life we live.’
Eleven people responded who work in hands-on community development roles (‘a broad term which encompasses Formal and Non-formal education, Human Rights Education and Advocacy, and Youth empowerment’). One framed their response as ‘ministry’ and another spoke of being motivated by Jesus and Edmund Rice.
Eleven people responded from a role in a development organisation (an organisation supporting development, capacity building, fundraising, etc):
- Whereas it is referred to as ministry in religious circles, we refer to it as social development work. I would describe what I do as service which in many spheres is now called Ministry.’
- Whilst not in ministry, our work represents those in ministry and are stewards of funds from our donors. I am constantly in touch with the ministries on the ground’.
- Our development projects seek to serve the furthest behind in society, following the Christian Brothers mission to serve the poor and take them Jesus’ message of love and compassion.
8 responses came from people who fulfil a governance role on a Board. While most do not consider their task as ministry, they see it as supporting those who are in ‘hands on ministry’:
3 people responded from a commitment to ecology and referenced Pope Francis’ ‘Laudato Si’ as a source of inspiration.
15 people framed their understanding of their role in terms of spirituality and faith, while 3 mentioned service:
- As a member of the school community and a Catholic, living by example to encourage students to embrace the essentials of Edmund Rice, develop their own spirituality and grow in relationship with their faith and the wider community
- I see the choice I made to teach specifically at a Catholic school… I also see my daily work with students as an act of faith: I do my best every day to give my students meaningful educational experiences, and I have faith that God is with me in that endeavour… I also hope that my actions and example I portray as a person have a positive impact on my Catholic and non-Catholic students on the way they view God, the Christian faith and Christians.
- In the spirit of the Gospels and of Edmund Rice, I deliberately choose to work with those who are on the edges of society, particularly the stranger, the migrant, refugees, asylum seekers and humanitarian entrants.
A few framed their commitment in terms of Service
- I consider what I do, teaching and being available to the learners as a service, hence it is a ministry.
- I would describe what I do as service which in many spheres is now called Ministry. I didn’t set out to be a Minister but I did set out to be of service.
- I have never thought about my job as a Ministry, but since I live it as a service, a vocation, I could say it is a ministry in Edmund’s charism.
17 respondents identified themselves as Brothers who are on a Province Leadership Team. Some framed their lives in terms of ‘responding to the call of the gospel as a disciple of Jesus’. Some described their activities in a variety of ways; from the individual outreach to people by retired men, leadership in community, or supporting younger Brothers who are university students.
19 respondents, including both teachers and administrators, described their role primarily as a job. This was not a negative reflection on their role:
- For me, whether a project is part of a ministry or not, is just not important to me. I am only interested in helping people improve their standard of living. One of the most impressive things I see in the ER projects is the fact it doesn’t matter if you are Christian or not, male or female etc. All of the flagship and most impressive projects have very little focus on religion other than honouring the charism of Edmund Rice.
- Ministry is a church term that implies motivation linked to church belonging. In my case, this is probably true. However, for many others in ER work, this may not apply.’
- I work with youth groups in the city, and I suppose faith or the goals of the church do not actively or consciously come into it.
Connection to others involved in Edmund Rice Work
Just over half of the respondents thought that they were well connected to others involved in Edmund Rice work. For another third, the connection was moderate. Only 3% reported that they felt totally disconnected.
Responses related to the frequency of engagement with others involved with Edmund Rice work, painted a somewhat different picture of connection. The largest category reported the frequency as ‘Sometimes’ (40%), while 18% reported that engagement was rare or non-existent. It is clear from the data that respondents crave more connection and collaboration, with 90 % of respondents suggesting that they would do so if opportunities were presented.
In written comments, almost all respondents spoke of the benefits of greater collaboration. Several suggested that formal structures need to be developed to optimize and organise greater collaboration. Many mentioned recent Zoom Conferences, the emergence of EREBB and ERI as examples of the way collaboration within the Edmund Rice family should continue to grow.
Some sample comments include:
- We have a link with the CB schools re asylum seekers and refugees. Would be good to involve more network people in this field.
- I would like to continue collaborating and sharing because many times when we share with other members of the network it feels like a family and it helps especially with virtual platforms. I would like to continue in contact reinforcing the charism digitally.
- I feel if there is to be a coordinated approach to ER Mission, then there needs to be an entity that represents the global ER partners and provides leadership.
- The Edmund Rice network is one of several I am involved with through my professional life. I think it’s important to value each, none to the exclusion or minimising of the other.
- I attended the EREBB Symposium in Lima, Peru in 2019 and made connections with schools across the globe. We have a very active ‘whatsapp’ group so there is constant sharing of info and happenings within the network.
- I find the Zoom Meetings organised at Province Level and worldwide to be very helpful in connecting us with the wider Congregation. Retreat and Prayer sessions on Zoom have been very supportive in lockdown periods during the Covid pandemic.
- Collaboration is at the heart of the legacy of Edmund Rice and all interested in living out his legacy must be prepared to support each other in service, prayer, community building and ministry.
- I consider it essential to work in close collaboration with all the branches of the Brothers’ ministries, as we are part of the Edmund Rice Network family.
- Over the past ten years ERI has built up good connections through its training courses with members of the ER network involved in advocacy and human rights at local level in their respective countries and keeps in regular contact with them.
- Partnership with others, it has helped me to share the Edmund Rice story and think globally.
- I recently participated in the five-week Advocacy Zoom training through ERI. What a joy to hear from, meet with, and learn from and alongside members of the Edmund Rice community across the world. I am excited to be part of the inaugural cohort of EREBB Global Classroom Partners.
- I would welcome more structured collaboration with other agencies involved in development mission.
- What is urgently needed is to probe the evolving nature of the Edmund Rice charism today i.e. EREBB, school trusts.
- The amazing work and extensive nature of the ‘network’ is better known to me now, in this my fourth year in the role. By organising collaborative experiences such as online meetings, reporting on other agencies and schools in our own network publications, inviting experts from around the network to work with us, having joint online reflections, good social media, joint advocacy campaigns and close contacts in all regions has meant that I have been able to develop the collaborative nature of the network in my own way. Examples this year: Global Classroom Partners in schools, Why Francis met Greta online course, Women in ER Leadership Campaign, The ER Journey to COP26 collaboration. The sense of community and family, that we are all working to be the change we want to see in the world and to demonstrate a living, breathing Edmund Rice Charism is extremely important to me.
- As a Young Christian Brother, I always think of the future of the Congregation, and looking at the number of young Brothers currently, the Congregation is losing vocations gradually. Working closely with other people (collaborators) may help us as a Congregation to keep our Charism active and alive through their engagement with all of God’s creation.
- My experience has been that – this process and many others – will produce a document or a statement that will float down from ‘on high’ and people at the coal face or chalk face will know little or nothing about us. Nothing about us without us. Please, please, please ensure that whatever you do in this process that it directly involves people at the grassroots – doing ministry / being ministers.
- All the evidence is that EREBB has done a lot of good, building collaborative networks around school ministry. The experience with MCST and ERI is no different.
- I do believe that while I am a member of the Congregation, we need to collaborate. We are in this together. The Charism of Edmund is alive both in the Congregation and in the many ER partners. In today’s world it is very important to collaborate as we have much to offer to and learn from each other, thus strengthening the whole.
Sustainability of the Work
75% of respondents reported that they are likely to be working in their current roles for the next three to five years. Two thirds reported their confidence that their work or ministry has a long-term future. Only 2% were not confident at all.
Most respondents linked their diminished confidence in the future of their work to the rapidly decreasing number of Brothers involved in ministry and low numbers of men entering the Congregation. Many expressed concerns about the ‘Brother centric’ nature of the work. Resourcing the work, beyond the time of the Brothers’ involvement, was also reported as a real threat to sustainability.
Some sample comments include:
- I think it could be a question of finances, the continuity of the Brothers in administering the project.
- It is very probable that the Brothers will withdraw from the country because they are advanced in age, hence it is difficult for the project to continue.
- The Community, except for one member, are all aged between 80 and 90. Energy levels tend to wane as we get into the mid-eighties. There are very few younger Brothers to take our place.
- I said I was somewhat confident, which is not “not confident”. Reason: the Brothers in the Americas are aging out. While this is a problem in and of itself, it would seem to me that, despite the lip service paid to passing the torch and charism to the laity, the Brothers don’t practice what they preach. They don’t seem interested in sharing autonomy with the laity or in practicing the Catholic principle of subsidiarity.
- The work we do depends on the presence of Brothers with expertise and passion in community development. We have had Brothers, especially of the younger generation, not staying for long. They come, get trained and proceed to school. The program needs to be more adequately resourced in terms of human capital (i.e numbers, sector-specialisation & expertise).
- Ministries I am running currently are totally donor dependent hence this puts their sustainability at stake.
- I believe that there needs to be more “future-proofing” of ER mission through robust planning and delegation. There needs to be greater clarity of roles across various entities. In ministries, there needs to be greater embracing of the role of laity in continuing the Brother’s mission and there needs to be strengthened autonomous legal governance with delegation from the Provinces.
- I am involved in real ministry of various types, but my main external ministries are of the type that a lay person could easily. This is not to say that all of what I do, or ministries that I could do, lay people could do. There are some ministries that at the present time and in the foreseeable future, Brothers have unique opportunities to do, for example cross-cultural or international ministries, living among the poor, formation, and some internal ministries — these are all things which I do and which in my setting, (Peru) lay people are only now beginning to take on and will need to be accompanied for the next — 10, 15? Years. “The problem is with the term, “long term”. In our changing world, how long is that? And in the “long term” we — the Congregation — may transform into something quite different.
- As development work standards and donor requirements increase over time, the Congregation needs to ensure they are placing the correct people in roles and not just giving them a role as they are a Brother. Females need to be embraced into the Congregation. At present there is a disappointingly low number of females on all of the project boards. So much excellent work is being carried out in the projects, but for it to continue the congregation will have to move with the times and start looking at more innovative approaches which include bringing lay people on-board.
- It all depends on availability of funding, donor interest and relationship between us and the respective ministries. Covid has also shrunk resources and it just makes everything uncertain.
- My answer is based on the declining numbers of Brothers across the Congregation. I believe the present system of apostolic religious life within the Catholic Church is in irreversible decline. It is time for change and adaptation to a different world from the needs of the 17th/18th centuries. Formal religion is under “suspicion” by the majority in the developed world. The child abuse crisis is still a cause of major concern. I wonder if the Church (Christian Brothers) has the ability and insight to bring about the required changes – “The seed must die”. The above is global. However, the impact is being seen in the declining numbers participating in parish life and very few joining religious life.
- Continued funding is essential. Commitment of Leadership to enable Brothers and others in the Network to be and live with people who are made poor. Community Development/Engagement takes time and patience. A presence and building of relationships is essential to empower the local community.
- There are sexual assault accusations that need to be dealt with. How this will impact my school is up in the air still.
- There is limited availability of Brothers to form the local Christian Brother communities in Western Zambia. A core of committed Brothers living within the marginal communities is at the heart of the current “Journeying Together” strategy. The Brothers supply a local presence and a vital local relationship-building function on which the whole community engagement model works. The lay project staff are committed too but do not live among the people in the marginal communities. It is not yet clear how the sustainability of such Brothers’ communities is part of the Africa Province Plan.
- Before this time, Brothers were making more meaningful impacts on the life of young people in schools when most people didn’t think of becoming teachers. But due to the evolving realities, we need a shift as a congregation in terms of ministry. The classroom for me, won’t be the only place to bring Christ (LIFE) to the people and to gain life in the mere future.
- Simply because of the fact that at present all the trustees are members of the congregation. This cannot continue for much longer. However, the work of the trust will continue through participation of the lay members of ERN and the collaboration of other Religious
- The aging profile of brothers means that we have to explore more creative ways for leadership.
- The ministries in this Province are overly CB-centric and there seems to be little appetite in the Province to genuinely engage professionals on par. The number of capable and willing CBs isn’t exactly growing, so the writing is on the wall for those who wish to see.
- It is basically run at the moment by Christian Brothers with the help of a number of Edmund Rice volunteers. I really can’t see the project being continued when the Brothers withdraw. All the Brothers involved are over seventy years old.
Questions for further Exploration
Participants were asked to respond to 2 questions related to areas related to Edmund Rice work that would be the focus of further exploration/discussion.
In a ranking exercise, the areas that received the highest priority (in order) were:
- What is it about our work that makes it specifically and authentically a work of ‘Edmund Rice’?
- What formation and professional development do we need to do our work?
- Where does education fit into our understanding of mission and ministry?
- What is the future role of the Christian Brothers as partners in ministry?
Participants were also asked to nominate others areas for future exploration that were not specifically dealt with in the survey. The following were prioritised:
- Human rights, the environment and the sustainable goals.
- Structures for better collaboration. How do we minimise language barriers to communication and collaboration?
- Where are we heading in the next 20 years? Alternative models of leadership.
- Forming lay people in the core priorities of ER vision. (A generalised Formation experience.)
- Relationship between the vision of Jesus and the charism of Edmund.
- Good practices in accountability, monitoring and evaluating. Strategies for enhancing the funding base.
- How do we continue to strengthen EREBB? Whatever can be learned from EREBB related to structures independent of the CBs?
Conclusion
Several respondents expressed gratitude for the opportunity to participate and the vast majority recorded interest in participation in any future processes that will allow for us to ‘drill down’ on the data. This next phase could take the form of targeted discussions/seminars, focus groups etc.